Proof
Named evidence, reported separately.
Every figure names its source. Coverage and effort stand apart, never merged into one number. No anonymous flagships.
LBBW has used SQACE as its central platform for data testing since 2020 and is expanding independent verification from 6 to 70–80 applications.
40 %
less effort across the data-test lifecycle
50 %
less effort creating test cases
up to 90 %
shorter test runtime
Source: LBBW, publicly documented on sqace.io
At Commerzbank, an anti-money-laundering monitoring pipeline is verified fully automatically with SQACE.
Source: Commerzbank, cleared reference
Method-framed
Coverage and effort, separately.
≈ 80 % coverage
Around 80 % of data processing can be covered with the rule-based approach.
An honest scope statement, not an effort figure. The rest stays a deliberate special case.
up to 80 % less effort
Up to 80 % less effort than manual or self-built testing.
Example: a self-built solution at ten days per release, automated on day one with SQACE. Project-dependent, reported separately from coverage.
We deliberately do not merge coverage and effort into one number, because they measure different things.
Origin
Over 20 years of banking-domain depth.
SQACE comes from FINARIS, from over 20 years working on data processes in banks (formerly RapidRep). Built and operated in Frankfurt am Main. That origin is why the evidence comes from banking.
See the proof on your own case.
In a demo we show the expected-vs-actual comparison on one of your use cases. Or see a full verification run first.